Archive for Uncategorized
Understand Scrum, Understand Implementing PDCA
Posted by: | CommentsI had the pleasure interviewing James O. Coplein, author of the Lean Architecture: for Agile Software Development for an upcoming Business901 podcast. I seem to learn so much from the software community and had picked up Jim’s book to help provide a framework for parts of the Lean Marketing House (Marketing with Lean)
. I was so impressed with the book that I contacted him for a podcast. An excerpt from the book:
A good feedback cycle has the appearance of causing problems. It will cause emergent and latent requirements to surface. That means rework: the value of prototypes is that they push this rework back into analysis, where it has more value. And most important, good end user engagement changes end user expectations. It is only by participating in a feedback loop that’s grounded in reality that customers get the opportunity they need to reflect on what they’re asking for. If your customer changes their expectations in the process, you’ve both learned something. Embracing change doesn’t just mean reacting to it: it means providing the catalysts that accelerate it.
Explanations like this proliferate throughout the book. and he builds a complete framework for building a Lean Culture without ever calling it that. In the podcast, we talked about the evolution and interpretation of Lean and/or Toyota Production System (TPS) and their relationship with Scrum. It is interesting how they complement each other. In one sense, it is interesting how Scrum is hardly more than a PDCA cycle. But on the other hand it really enhances the PDCA cycle in the spirit of teamwork and flow.
In this video, the Father of Scrum, Jeff Sutherland, CEO of Scrum, Inc and Senior Advisor to OpenView Venture Partners discusses the evolution of Scrum. Jeff discusses the roles, the meetings and the reporting process associated with Scrum methodology.
This video provides an understanding of Scrum and provides a basis for how a team can operate in an iterative fashion. I was always taught in project management to always look at what was left to do more than what was completed. This is a basic theory of the burn-down chart.
Related Information:
Jeff Sutherland’s Website: http://scrum.jeffsutherland.com/
James Coplein;s Website: Gertrude and Cope
Related Posts
Should you Manage your Organization with Agile Techniques?
The differences in Lean and Agile
Agile, Scrum, Kanban, or is it just a Marketing Funnel?
Pull: The Pull in Lean Marketing
Value Stream Marketing and the Indirect Marketing Concept
ASQ Columbus Spring Conference will host Marketing with Lean
Posted by: | CommentsThe theme of the ASQ Columbus Spring Conference 2011 is Leadership through Quality. After enjoying morning and after-lunch key-note speakers, attendees will have the opportunity to choose from both morning and afternoon tracks covering more than 14 different topics to include Marketing with Lean and I will be presenting it!
The conference is held at The Columbus State Conference Center, 315 Cleveland Avenue,
Columbus, Ohio 43215. It is a one day event on March 24th with registration beginning at 7:30 AM and the conference from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM. Additional information and registration can be obtained at http://www.asq-columbus.org.
Joe Dager says of the Marketing with Lean program, "This requires re-thinking about the way you do business and the way you think about your markets. More importantly, the way you think about value. Value in terms of how your market defines it. Stop thinking about product or even product benefits. Your marketing systems must support the delivery of value to your customer at a much higher rate than your competitor’s. It is a moving target and the principles of Lean and PDCA facilitate the journey to customer value. Learn what the terms Agility, Speed and Relevance fit into the marketplace today and in the future."
ASQ is a global community of experts and the leading authority on quality in all fields, organizations, and industries.
* As a professional association, ASQ advances the professional development, credentials, knowledge and information services, membership community, and advocacy on behalf of its more than 85,000 members worldwide.
* As champion of the quality movement, ASQ members are driven by a sense of responsibility to enrich their lives, to improve their workplaces and communities, and to make the world a better place by applying quality tools, techniques, and systems
Related Information:
Why does sales and marketing operate to a different quality standard?
The Future of Marketing is Lean
Why Lean Marketing? Because it is the Future of Marketing …
PDCA for Lean Marketing, Knowledge Creation
Why does sales and marketing operate to a different quality standard?
Posted by: | CommentsAfter reviewing the new edition of Juran’s Quality Handbook: The Complete Guide to Performance Excellence 6/e, I wondered why companies hold the entire company to such a high quality standard but leave Sales and Marketing off the hook. Technological measures of quality has existed on shop floors for many years, but measures of quality have not existed in sales and marketing. It has been difficult for organizations to recognize this need as they lacked the necessary alarm signals. As an increasing number of companies become commoditized and market share dwindles, these alarms are going off all over country. It is simply a lack of demand.
The good news is that the methods, tools and know-how now exist to use quality in your process to drive market share and increase revenue. Sales and Marketing needs to become part of the quality process within your company. not only to improve their own methods but to lead their companies out of this dilemma of surviving in an economy of an overabundance of supply. However, what’s not in place is the culture of continuous improvement and the ability to understand the changing perception of customer value.
In the new Juran Quality Handbook they listed the lessons learned by organizations that were successful in their quality initiatives. Their analysis showed that despite differences among the organizations, there was much commonality. These common strategies included the following:
- Customers and quality have top priority. Thus customer satisfaction was the chief operating goal embedded in the vision and strategic plans. This was written into
corporate policies and scorecards. - Create a performance excellence system. All organizations that attained superior results did so with a change program or a systematic model for change. This model enables
organizational breakthroughs to occur. - Do strategic planning for quality. The business plan was opened up to include quality goals and balanced scorecards, year after year.
- Benchmark best practices. This approach was adopted to set goals based on superior results already achieved by others.
- Engage in continuous innovation and process improvement. The business plan was opened up to include goals for improvement. It was recognized that quality is a moving target; therefore there is no end to improving processes.
- Offer training in managing for quality, the methods and tools. Training was extended beyond the quality department to all functions and levels, including upper managers.
- Create an organization-wide assurance focus. This focus is on improving and ,ensuring that all goods, services, processes, and functions in an organization are of high quality.
- Project by project, create multifunctional teams. Multifunctional teams, adopted to give priority to organization results rather than to functional goals, and later extended to include suppliers and customers, are key to creating breakthroughs in current performance. They focus on the “vital few” opportunities for improvement.
- Empower employees. This includes training and empowering the workforce to participate in planning and improvement of the “useful many” opportunities. Motivation was supplied through extending the use of recognition and rewards for responding to the changes demanded by the quality revolution. Measurements were developed to enable upper managers to follow progress toward providing customer satisfaction, meeting competition, improving quality, and so on. Upper managers took charge of managing for quality by recognizing that certain responsibilities were not delegable—they were to be carried out by the upper managers, personally.
- Build an adaptable and sustainable organization. Quality is defined by the customers. Customers are driven by societal problems. Quality now includes safety, no harm to the environment, low cost, ease of use, etc. To succeed, all organizations must focus on attaining sustainable organizations.
You may consider your organization is doing many of these things very well. I challenge even the most successful companies to rate their sales and marketing by the same standards. What would you find? Just citing one area, do you measure improvements of processes, or do you compensate people? These ten strategies are possible in sales and marketing. However, quality improvements are seldom obtained without a methodology.
This is why I believe the Future of Marketing is Lean!
Related Posts
The Future of Marketing is Lean
PDCA for Lean Marketing, Knowledge Creation
Lean Marketing Creates Knowledge for the Customer
Why Lean Marketing? Because it is the Future of Marketing …
The Pull in Lean Marketing
The 7 step Lean Process of Marketing to Toyota
The Marketing Knowledge Spiral

