Archive for Product Launch

Campaign Marketing was discussed in the Business901 podcasts, What Political Campaigns can teach business, part 1 of 2  and part 2 of 2. Part one was more of a strategic view and part 2 more tactical. This is a transcription of both of the the podcasts. I find political campaign marketing very relevant to typical business marketing. Political campaigns have more experience in creating touch-points, managing limited budgets and crafting their message to the audience that they are addressing. An excellent primer when developing a social media strategy and turning it into a handshake.    

 

Derek A. Pillie has served public and political candidates for over 15 years. He has served on the staff of Indiana’s Third Congressional District, most recently as District Director for just over a decade. In that role, he oversaw Indiana operations of the office; including constituent outreach and helping taxpayers solve problems with federal agencies. He also worked on crucial economic development projects and was heavily involved with advising the office on online media and marketing decisions.

After his federal service expired Derek started working at Cirrus ABS, an online marketing and technology development company. He currently manages their business development efforts. Cirrus ABS has added political campaigns to the portfolio of industries they serve since Derek joined the team, and he continues volunteer efforts on behalf of candidates he supports.

Related Information:
Political Campaigning – Strategy Update
What political campaigns can teach business
Lean Marketing Lab Opens!
Start with Journey Mapping vs Value Stream Mapping

Comments (0)

When we use money as the premise for value, “What a customer is willing to pay for” makes sense. We certainly pay for the value of a Ferrari. Using this argument, money can be the determining factor of value. Something about it rubs me wrong and by the way, I am a capitalist at heart, so it is not the warm and fuzzy stuff that is causing me to think this way. The term is widespread but in present day scenarios, it may be fundamentally flawed. We live in a world that has excess supply and as a result we have to start viewing the market from the Demand side. So the connotation what a "Customer will pay for" is problematic for me. That seems to be from an internal focus. Money-CloudIt stems from the process improvement mindset of the 90’s, stayed with us through the Customer Experience decade and now as the User Experience decade is upon us it is simply not useful anymore (excuse the pun).

Many organizations justify improvements by using the word value and customer, internal or external. In fact, the process at times becomes more important than what the customer values. But if it is not tied to the marketplace and improvement is shown there, why should you do it? The real bugger is that someone shows how much savings they create (Cycle Time, Space, etc. without a demand for utilization) when in fact there was none. I equate it to politicians when they slow down the growth of government spending and proclaim it a cut in spending. What purpose does creating internal value serve? Should value not be perceived and created from an outside-in approach versus an inside-out approach? Is that what pull is all about?

A good dominant marketing logic arguably limits the mind-set for seeing the opportunities for co-creation of value with customers and other stakeholders of the firm. In a similar way, a transactional exchange view ignores customer loyalty and puts constraints on developing the lifetime value of the customer to the firm. The S-D logic proposes broadening the logic of exchange, both social and economic. – Lusch and Vargo Marketing Theory, 2006

I have seen a significant shift in the concept of value. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Craigslist, software companies and others now allow "use" free of charge. It is not a free trial offer. We derive value from it. If we want to extend that value or increase it we pay; Ads, membership, etc. Value is something (product/service) that someone uses. For example, if I download software or buy a book but do not "use" it, it has no value even though I purchased it.

It is in the use of the product/service that value is derived. I think of value in 3 ways: Functional, Emotional, Social. Thinking of a Ferrari (Example from my esteem colleague Graham Hill) …I use it to drive (functional), makes me feel good (emotional) and what others think – I am successful (social). All provide value but without the latter two, I could buy a bike. Using this as a guideline for value (Functional, Emotional, Social), value is embedded in the use of the product rather than the price.

Forrester predicts that by 2012 half of all consumer purchases will either be transacted online or driven by online research and word of mouth. To succeed in the digital marketplace, it’s no longer customers that matter most, but users—anyone who interacts with your company digitally. Keep users happy, and customers follow.

If we only leave price be the governing factor, would value only be a commodity? I think it is more about users and the use of the product that determines value, Facebook being a prime example. The value was enormous before they ever monetized it. 

Today’s most successful companies organize their business around users and building user satisfaction," writes Aaron Shapiro CEO of digital agency HUGE in his book Users, Not Customers: Who Really Determines the Success of Your Business.

Today’s most critical driver of success is usability excellence. Users are your growth engine for your customer base and for your entire organization!

Related Information:
It’s the Who, not the Why @simonsinek
It’s not about the things we make, it’s how we use the things we make
The Zappos Culture Defined!
Do you understand where demand comes from?
Who Really Determines the Success of Your Business

Comments (0)
Dec
01

Is your Innovation a Gateway for Others?

Posted by: | Comments (0)

Henry Chesbrough and Gary Hamel Talk Innovation Platforms in the video below posted on the site Innovation Excellence, Henry Chesbrough, originator of the concept of open innovation, discusses products as an innovation platform.

MIX Maverick and award-winning author Henry Chesbrough discusses how Nokia had fantastic success in the 90s building products but got left behind by companies who are now building platforms.

The MIX (Management Innovation eXchange) is the world’s first open innovation project aimed at reinventing management. On the MIX, impassioned innovators from around the world are working together to create organizations that are as resilient, inventive, and inspiring as the people who work within them. It’s time to reinvent management. You can help. Join the MIX: www.hackmanagement.com.

First viewed this video on: CoCreation News

Related Books by Henry Chesbrough:
Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology
Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape

Related Information:
Why the Lean SALES PDCA Cycle was Created!
Will Product Managers embrace Open Innovation?

Categories : Product Launch
Comments (0)